3 ms·
There was also ObjectiveFS discussed on HN a few days ago, also closed source: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10117506 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?i
by _delirium 11y ago
There was also ObjectiveFS discussed on HN a few days ago, also closed source: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10117506 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10117506
Main difference appears to be that it supports concurrent mounts, while S3QL can be mounted by one client at a time.
- LeoPanthera 11y agoSurely the "main" difference is that ObjectiveFS is a paid service with prices starting at $7/mount. S3QL is FOSS.