>Science cannot nor does it claim to be something one can use to acquire certainty about anything I have heard this too. Although I still fail to grasp how one

>Science cannot nor does it claim to be something one can use to acquire certainty about anything I have heard this too. Although I still fail to grasp how one can hold that view, which shows thought, critical thinking and analysis, then argue that a book written / made up / dictated too by God / added to / amended / edited over the last few thousand years is held up to be something that can gives us certain. Which is the complete opposite of the thinking they put forward with regards to science.