4 ms·
Reading this the idea of "modelling" from gestalt therapy[1] came to mind. I think it's quite practical to create an internal model of another person, which can
by theoh 11y ago
Reading this the idea of "modelling" from gestalt therapy[1] came to mind. I think it's quite practical to create an internal model of another person, which can be refined over time through observation. Fringe practices like "tulpamancy" involve actually "running" such a construct, and I think, whatever the truth behind the claims of tulpamancers, there is a lot still unknown about this (see also multiple personality, or dissociative identity disorder, and of course "hearing voices" in schizophrenia).
Edit: [1] Actually it is a "neuro-linguistic programming" concept, which makes it a bit less credible. Still, the concept is clear.
- jsprogrammer 11y agoIt may be practical in that there might not be any better option, but it would be dangerous to believe that you are gaining actual insight into the subjective experience of the other person (whom, technically we don't even know exists as a separate entity). At best, you can perhaps know that you are gaining insight into your own model of another person.