I should step back some from it being a bad name... It's actually a great name, it just conflicts with an in-use library that does substantially the same thing

I should step back some from it being a bad name... It's actually a great name, it just conflicts with an in-use library that does substantially the same thing for another platform. Is there a convention where the 'node-' prefix is off-limits for any reason? I don't know if it's really any better but if this were 'node-cproto' I wouldn't have commented. The other option would be to do some word-play name like 'domesticator'.