3 ms·
>A "survivable" term isn't the criteria I personally use for choosing presidents. :) That's fair enough, but I would counter that: 1. We've been settling for
by omginternets 11y ago
>A "survivable" term isn't the criteria I personally use for choosing presidents. :)
That's fair enough, but I would counter that:
1. We've been settling for "survivable" terms for the past 10 years
2. Some people will take a hit for the greater good. I really wish you would be willing to do that too. That said, maybe you don't think Lessig's agenda would be serving the greater good, in which case I'd be interested in knowing why.
- Ankaios 11y agoI think his agenda is great. (I might quibble about things like ranked-choice versus approval voting, but that's immaterial for the moment.) I just think he's going to have to govern while trying to achieve that agenda, and I suspect he can do that successfully, so I'd like him to run for real rather than planning to quit after he's done.