The possibility they may suffer harm is generally not sufficient to confer standing. It has to actually occur. This is precedent set by the supreme court in ht

The possibility they may suffer harm is generally not sufficient to confer standing. It has to actually occur. This is precedent set by the supreme court in http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/clapper-v-amnesty-international-usa/ http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/clapper-v-amnesty... Courts do not decide cases based on speculative future injury. "To establish Article III standing, an injury must be "concrete, particularized, and actual or imminent; fairly traceable to the challenged action; and redressable by a favorable ruling." "