> Where does it say in the 4th amendment that it's okay to seize and search all the documents without a warrant, as long as there's "no harm"?! That is not wha

> Where does it say in the 4th amendment that it's okay to seize and search all the documents without a warrant, as long as there's "no harm"?! That is not what they're saying. It is understood that, if it can be shown the plaintiffs' documents were "[unreasonably] seized or searched", there would be an injury. What has not been shown (at least not clearly enough for a preliminary injunction) is that these plaintiffs' documents were searched/seized.