Taking Flash away is always a good new for privacy and security :) Anyway, is not sufficient. Why would google take a good but not sufficient approach? IMO be

Taking Flash away is always a good new for privacy and security :) Anyway, is not sufficient. Why would google take a good but not sufficient approach? IMO because of marketing issues: get some hackers and tech savvy people to evangelize that they are improving their privacy issues. I suppose google doesn't need flash/super cookies, "so lets take them out, we look good, and we still have the same entropy to get to know the user"