3 ms·
I'm wondering why most of the larger browser makers don't get together to agree on something. The W3C can clean it up later. I just don't think it would be too
by decadentcactus 17y ago
I'm wondering why most of the larger browser makers don't get together to agree on something. The W3C can clean it up later.
I just don't think it would be too hard for Moz/Webkit team/IE team to agree to support 'border-radius' and other things. Any smaller browsers would catch on soon enough anyway.
Well, getting the IE team to get it to work may be a challenge.
- bodhi 17y agoThe W3C CSS working group is the browser makers -- and others -- getting together to agree on something. http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/members.php3 http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/members.php3
- Groxx 17y agoIn addition to the comment by Bodhi, I feel I should point out that this is a HORRIBLE idea. Microsoft has been doing this for quite a while, and that's part of the reason web support (among other kinds of support) is so nasty. If anything, the W3C exists to make sure the standards don't conflict with themselves. When amateur spec-designers start throwing around specifications, run for the hills. There's going to be enough hellfire, brimstone, and general fail to satisfy any armageddon cult, but they'll all disagree on how the fail is going to happen. Endless hours will be spent in chatrooms and forums debating which fail will win, and in the end everyone has to crawl into their radiation-, mutant-rat-, gelatinous-ooze-, cosmic-ray-, alien-proof-bunkers every 37 minutes just to survive the onslaught of potential fail.