4 ms·
The article insinuates that the DEA branch was accused of conspiracy and espionage - other articles seem to imply that the President at least believed that the
by rincebrain 11y ago
The article insinuates that the DEA branch was accused of conspiracy and espionage - other articles seem to imply that the President at least believed that the DEA was following him around and spying on his romantic life, as well as implying that the US DEA branch attempted to contract killers to hit Bolivian gov't officials.
I can't imagine that the grounding of the President's plane under suspicions of housing Snowden warmed him up, either.
Further reading:
[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolivia%E2%80%93United_States_relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolivia%E2%80%93United_States_...
[2] - http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1856153,00.html http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1856153,00...
[3] - http://www.cepr.net/blogs/the-americas-blog/remember-when-venezuela-and-bolivia-kicked-the-us-dea-out-of-their-countries-accusing-it-of-espionage-looks-like-they-were-right http://www.cepr.net/blogs/the-americas-blog/remember-when-ve...
- roghummal 11y agoMeta-HN: Citations without citations. Further reading: [4] http://motherless.com http://motherless.com [5] http://slashdot.com http://slashdot.com [6] http://reddit.com http://reddit.com [7] http://motherless.com http://motherless.com (7+) Yes, this is listed twice. Edit: Put an 'l' in motherless, made a (something) into (7+). Not sure why...
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- roghummal 11y agoWhat's NSFW, exactly?
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- fnordfnordfnord 11y agoPsshhh! That's crazy talk. Our government wouldn't do anything like that.