2 ms·
"Sex worker" != prostitute But either way, you could certainly make that argument. I think there are two problems with the analogy, one specific and one genera
by nkozyra 11y ago
"Sex worker" != prostitute
But either way, you could certainly make that argument. I think there are two problems with the analogy, one specific and one general.
1. I think the purpose of the medium defines the description of the job. Narrative art that includes sex could be construed as a different "job" than participating in sex for erotica.
2. Sevigny and Gallo were dating at the time, which complicates the notion of prostitution but not at all "sex work."