> There's no /usr/lib and /usr/include analogue I would argue that it is a good thing to not rely on /usr/lib or /usr/include even on Unix. It is a pain for wh

> There's no /usr/lib and /usr/include analogue I would argue that it is a good thing to not rely on /usr/lib or /usr/include even on Unix. It is a pain for when a dev who is jumping on the team specially when the dependencies are not documented. The make-dependency error-install-make cycle is very annoying.