3 ms·

You could almost be talking about Steve Jobs there.

• nine_k 11y ago
  It just so happened that Jobs's companies were mostly highly (sometimes obscenely) profitable, while Amazon stays very near profitless for last ~20 years, having to re-invest all its proceedings.
  • eachro 11y ago
    "having to"? Bezos chooses to.
  • manigandham 11y ago
    "Profit" is a very vague term in corporate finance. Just because they don't put the cash in the bank doesn't mean they're not a profitable company.
  • grogenaut 11y ago
    Yeah next went gangbusters