3 ms·
I'm not sure what you are even trying to say here. First of all, states are hacking other friendly states. States they cooperate with. Then of course, foreign
by revelation 11y ago
I'm not sure what you are even trying to say here. First of all, states are hacking other friendly states. States they cooperate with.
Then of course, foreign intelligence services derive their power and existence outside of the normal law framework from the simple fact that they are generally not allowed to spy on their own (e.g. US) citizens. That is pretty much the very fine line that separates them from a state-funded terrorist conspiracy. In that light, any cooperation with another intelligence agency (which naturally isn't bound to not spying on US citizens) is prima facie suspect.
- logicallee 11y agoBut I was replying to the thought, which I quoted, that "to support another country's foreign intelligence service is nothing short of treason on an organized scale". (I mean official support and cooperation, that both services know about, like James Bond and Felix Leiter, his American counterpart who sometimes makes an appearance, in the films.)