4 ms·
> This is where I lost a track of your arguments. Then maybe you should maybe spend some time studying these topics instead of acting up on HN. > Lisp did not
by justthistime_ 11y ago
> This is where I lost a track of your arguments.
Then maybe you should maybe spend some time studying these topics instead of acting up on HN.
> Lisp did not fail. It's in pretty much all the mainstream languages now.
This is where I lost the last doubts about the reality and your lack of closeness with it.
- sklogic 11y ago> Then maybe you should maybe spend some time studying these topics instead of acting up on HN. Chances are, I implemented more varieties of type systems than you can name. > This is where I lost the last doubts about the reality and your lack of closeness with it. Scala fanboys are much more detached from the reality. The reality rejected bondage&discipline languages long ago.
- justthistime_ 11y agoYou continue to amuse me.
- sklogic 11y agoYou did not answer, fanboy. Does Scala already allow to use macro in the same compilation unit it was defined?
- dang 11y ago> You did not answer, fanboy We ban accounts that do this repeatedly. On HN, please post civilly and substantively, or not at all.
- dang 11y agoPlease eliminate rudeness from your comments on HN. You've crossed the line into incivility several times in this thread. That's unacceptable here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html Please also don't post unsubstantive comments. That means avoiding programming language flamewars, since they're only nominally about programming and really about insults and disses.