4 ms·
No, this was not a case of "not meeting my needs". I read your papers and carefully considered whether the design goals worked for me. It was a case of "poorly
by fra 11y ago
No, this was not a case of "not meeting my needs". I read your papers and carefully considered whether the design goals worked for me.
It was a case of "poorly implemented and poorly tested". I know lwIP is widely used, so I'm sure it's not all this bad. However, that was still a pretty big red flag for me.
- adunk 11y agoA couple of years ago Contiki had a lot of rough parts that were in dire need of a bit of love - something we've worked hard to fix in the past few versions. Version 3.0 is by far the most solid Contiki thus far. Maybe you got stuck in the middle of this Not sure about Coffee in particular though, simply because file systems isn't really the focus of Contiki. Unlike server and desktop OSes, where the file system really is a core item, embedded OSes like Contiki don't depend on them and they are only used by a small subset of applications.