3 ms·
Nonononono. Python does not need more string literal specifiers. For a language that avoid symbols and sigils like the plague, it already has an absurd amount o
by schmichael 11y ago
Nonononono. Python does not need more string literal specifiers. For a language that avoid symbols and sigils like the plague, it already has an absurd amount of string literal syntax.
Why not make a strfmt library on pypi that provides a single fmt(s, args, kwargs) function and let people call that? Why the obsession with more builtins?