> You're not wrong, and we should also consider that the attacker stopped and didn't go on a rampage at which point the 2nd amendment really becomes useful. Th

> You're not wrong, and we should also consider that the attacker stopped and didn't go on a rampage at which point the 2nd amendment really becomes useful. This is just asinine. The idea that everyone carrying an assault rifile would stop this kind of thing is one of the most ridiculous tropes the far right has to offer. It assumes rationality on the part of the initial shooter, who is very often NOT rational. Its also very much a blame-the-victim response.