4 ms·
I don't even have to read the article to know this is going to get down-voted into obscurity. It's like mom always said if you don't have something nice to say
by kra34 11y ago
I don't even have to read the article to know this is going to get down-voted into obscurity. It's like mom always said if you don't have something nice to say about this week's popular javascript framework, don't say anything at all (or else...)
PS This week's framework is actually Falcor
- sirtaj 11y agoI'm sympathetic to the basic idea, but surely this is not the article you're hoping for. There's a lot of ranting, with only a couple of sentences of actually useful information, eg. situations in which React is not a good fit. He mentions Angular for "data-bound REST apps" -- why? What makes React worse than Angular in that situation? What would be the tipping point in that situation that might make him use React instead? No data provided.
- kra34 11y agoYeah not exactly a well reasoned article about the strengths and weaknesses (these really do exist) of using React or X Other Framework. I went back and actually read it. The CEO of the Meteor Dev group gave the following presentation recently: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8G2SMVIUNNk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8G2SMVIUNNk He indirectly touches on some of those probably 25 minutes into the talk.
- the_rosentotter 11y agoWhen JavaScript frameworks have CEOs, you know something has gone horribly wrong.