3 ms·
> The package systems never had init system integration Never said integration saying packages have scripts to init themselves and that was different based on
by baldfat 11y ago
> The package systems never had init system integration
Never said integration saying packages have scripts to init themselves and that was different based on your distro.
Don't know why you feel the need to correct a point that distros are becoming more and more alike and that systemd is one of the elements that has helped this? Anywaysssss SystemD is the standard now for most of Linux and I am hoping for MORE standardization.
- vezzy-fnord 11y agoDistros are undeniably becoming more alike thanks to systemd, but from this premise does not in any way follow that package interoperability will be improved, which was the topic at hand. (To be pedantic, there is no "standardization" so to speak of. It's more like an informal fiat than anything.)
- baldfat 11y agoBUT deamons are now standardized on how to init them into systemd.
- digi_owl 11y ago"standardization" straight out of the MS play book that is...
- baldfat 11y agoFor what monetary end game???? I don't want to start the SystemD debates again but what "play" out of the playbook with what evil end game motivation?
- digi_owl 11y agoDoes it have to be monetary? Best i can tell, the people involved are on what may border on a holy crusade to "improve" the desktop Linux experience. Meaning that to them the goal justifies the means. And if you question this you are simply an ignorant infidel that will see the light in due time, they just need to spread the gospel more fervently (or should i say forcefully?).