3 ms·
Based on the tweet streams shared by the former employee she labeled her 'exit interview', I'm more going to side with the anonymous employee. The former employ
by michaelbuddy 11y ago
Based on the tweet streams shared by the former employee she labeled her 'exit interview', I'm more going to side with the anonymous employee. The former employee basically went on a complete rant ripping across Mozilla on twitter, but when it came to specific details, we end up with "never got a firefox t-shirt that fit me" and "nobody listened to my ideas" Talk about embarrassing yourself while burning a bridge. That kind of bridge burning is indicative of the kind of coworker she would be to some people.
Where does this weakness come from? Is it mental illness or just a parenting thing? And she also seems to conflate the ideas of software accessibility with "safespaces." If that's the kind of ideas that she was peddling to her colleagues, I'm pretty sure they aren't going to buy into that.
I don't know if it's a feminism thing or a LGBT thing but suddenly there are these new words that were invented, showed up in sketchy sociology classes and these people reform their individual reality by them and expect the rest of the world to suddenly be part of it. But they never asked whether these things were actually truthful or useful. Suddenly people are supposed to refer to themselves as 'CIS-gendered' and worry about 'safe spaces' where you won't 'trigger' anyone from too loud of applause.
The CEO should never have brought up this issue in a public meeting. It's an internal matter. And his misunderstanding of hate speech is disappointing, I have no respect for Mozilla as a company at this point. CEO needs to be removed, not the person who spoke their mind anonymously on reddit.