This is the nirvana fallacy. That people enter into contracts they later regret does not disprove the obvious benefits of allowing legally binding agreements.

This is the nirvana fallacy. That people enter into contracts they later regret does not disprove the obvious benefits of allowing legally binding agreements. If you have an alternate solution, by all means propose it. (And while we're on the topic of libertarianism, I'd like to note that lawyers being too expensive for poor people is largely a product certification costs, something libertarians want to get rid of)