He already said "Second, the fact that I disagree with the title has nothing to do with my opinion of the story." Why do you keep accusing him of dismissing th

He already said "Second, the fact that I disagree with the title has nothing to do with my opinion of the story." Why do you keep accusing him of dismissing the importance of the story? If he takes a moment to let you know that he was outraged, then may he comment on the fact that he thinks "it's poor practice to include the race, sexual orientation, or religion" if it's not directly relevant to the story?