4 ms·

What the hell are you talking about?

by deciplex 11y ago

deleted 11y ago
[deleted]
deleted 11y ago
[deleted]
orionblastar 11y ago
Apparently I'm kicking the hornets nest by questioning some hypothesis and showing flaws that some critics have found in modern Physics. I forgot to cite sources and my comment is closed to editing. Why hawking is wrong about black holes: http://www.universetoday.com/108870/why-hawking-is-wrong-about-black-holes/ http://www.universetoday.com/108870/why-hawking-is-wrong-abo... Why the Higgs Boson found may be an impostor: http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428428/higgs-boson-may-be-an-imposter-say-particle-physicists/ http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428428/higgs-boson-may-... Hawking admits he is wrong on black holes, makes corrections to his theories http://www.nature.com/news/stephen-hawking-there-are-no-black-holes-1.14583 http://www.nature.com/news/stephen-hawking-there-are-no-blac... Why General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics aren't compatible: http://www.quora.com/Why-are-general-relativity-and-quantum-mechanics-not-compatible http://www.quora.com/Why-are-general-relativity-and-quantum-... Black Holes are like Wormholes: http://mkaku.org/home/articles/blackholes-wormholes-and-the-tenth-dimension/ http://mkaku.org/home/articles/blackholes-wormholes-and-the-... Einstein when he talks about God it is Spinoza's God: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinozism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinozism It is a key to understanding his theories. Einstein argues with quantum theory scientists: http://www.amazon.com/Shaky-Game-Science-Conceptual-Foundations/dp/0226249492 http://www.amazon.com/Shaky-Game-Science-Conceptual-Foundati... Black Holes do not destroy matter: http://guardianlv.com/2015/04/black-holes-do-not-destroy-matter-hawking-was-wrong/ http://guardianlv.com/2015/04/black-holes-do-not-destroy-mat... I could be wrong, my citations could be wrong, but this is the way we learn by testing things out.
- deciplex 11y ago
  You seem to think there is some sort of schism in physics, with one side on GR insisting it is "correct" and one side on QM insisting their model is what the universe "really is". That's not the case at all and I'm not sure what's leading you to that conclusion - everyone knows both models are incomplete and it is not at all controversial to say as much. You're not really kicking a hornet's nest, rather you're just talking nonsense. You're so off base it's impossible for anyone to take you seriously enough to be upset. "You're not even wrong" as the saying goes.
  - orionblastar 11y ago
    Thank you for correcting me. I didn't understand why I was being downvoted. I've confused the incompleteness of both theories with being conflicting. I've learned from it now.
- robotkilla 11y ago
  >I could be wrong first time you've been right. > this is the way we learn by testing things out. that's not at all what you're doing. you're pushing an anti-science, pro-creationist agenda.

What the hell are you talking about?

deleted 11y ago

[deleted]

deleted 11y ago

[deleted]

orionblastar 11y ago

Apparently I'm kicking the hornets nest by questioning some hypothesis and showing flaws that some critics have found in modern Physics. I forgot to cite sources and my comment is closed to editing. Why hawking is wrong about black holes: http://www.universetoday.com/108870/why-hawking-is-wrong-about-black-holes/ http://www.universetoday.com/108870/why-hawking-is-wrong-abo... Why the Higgs Boson found may be an impostor: http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428428/higgs-boson-may-be-an-imposter-say-particle-physicists/ http://www.technologyreview.com/view/428428/higgs-boson-may-... Hawking admits he is wrong on black holes, makes corrections to his theories http://www.nature.com/news/stephen-hawking-there-are-no-black-holes-1.14583 http://www.nature.com/news/stephen-hawking-there-are-no-blac... Why General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics aren't compatible: http://www.quora.com/Why-are-general-relativity-and-quantum-mechanics-not-compatible http://www.quora.com/Why-are-general-relativity-and-quantum-... Black Holes are like Wormholes: http://mkaku.org/home/articles/blackholes-wormholes-and-the-tenth-dimension/ http://mkaku.org/home/articles/blackholes-wormholes-and-the-... Einstein when he talks about God it is Spinoza's God: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinozism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinozism It is a key to understanding his theories. Einstein argues with quantum theory scientists: http://www.amazon.com/Shaky-Game-Science-Conceptual-Foundations/dp/0226249492 http://www.amazon.com/Shaky-Game-Science-Conceptual-Foundati... Black Holes do not destroy matter: http://guardianlv.com/2015/04/black-holes-do-not-destroy-matter-hawking-was-wrong/ http://guardianlv.com/2015/04/black-holes-do-not-destroy-mat... I could be wrong, my citations could be wrong, but this is the way we learn by testing things out.

deciplex 11y ago
You seem to think there is some sort of schism in physics, with one side on GR insisting it is "correct" and one side on QM insisting their model is what the universe "really is". That's not the case at all and I'm not sure what's leading you to that conclusion - everyone knows both models are incomplete and it is not at all controversial to say as much. You're not really kicking a hornet's nest, rather you're just talking nonsense. You're so off base it's impossible for anyone to take you seriously enough to be upset. "You're not even wrong" as the saying goes.
- orionblastar 11y ago
  Thank you for correcting me. I didn't understand why I was being downvoted. I've confused the incompleteness of both theories with being conflicting. I've learned from it now.
robotkilla 11y ago
>I could be wrong first time you've been right. > this is the way we learn by testing things out. that's not at all what you're doing. you're pushing an anti-science, pro-creationist agenda.