3 ms·
It appears to be mostly a clarification of his previous argument that information is retained in the [incomprehensibly small fluctuations of the] geometry of th
by scythe 11y ago
It appears to be mostly a clarification of his previous argument that information is retained in the [incomprehensibly small fluctuations of the] geometry of the event horizon.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1401.5761.pdf http://arxiv.org/pdf/1401.5761.pdf
I'm guessing people are taking it seriously, but as it's not a complete theory of the dynamics it's hard to say "solved" in reference to this development.
- zamalek 11y ago> his previous argument AFAIK that wasn't originally his argument, but he conceded and agreed that it was likely a better hypothesis than Hawking Radiation. This talk seems to be a brilliant attempt at reconciling, what were previously, two competing hypothesis.