I'd like to take a little poll, if I might. The basis: 1) There was a plan in Copenhagen to give $100 billion to poor nations to "help them cope with climate c

I'd like to take a little poll, if I might. The basis: 1) There was a plan in Copenhagen to give $100 billion to poor nations to "help them cope with climate change". 2) Since 1998 the temperature of the earth has fallen about 0.4 F. 3) The actions these nations need to take against global warming are very different than those they need to take against global cooling. Questions: 1) Is the money they were to be given to be spent to protect against warming, or cooling? 2) Whichever one you picked, why aren't they more specific in their namimg? Why the ambiguity?