3 ms·

No it is not. See the discussion here: https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/133 https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/133

• Touche 11y ago
  What there contradicts what I said? I'm aware of innerHTML hacks that make it possible to work around but those are not valid attribute names. I'm not even against the syntax; i like it, but that doesn't change the fact that it is invalid html.
  • sangnoir 11y ago
    Parent quotes the W3 Spec to prove that it's legal, and your response is "it's illegal because $BROWSER say's so"? I trust the spec more than an implementation.
    • Touche 11y ago
      The parent didn't quote the spec, they quoted a GitHub issue with 71 participants. If you want to post a link to the spec text please do. If true I'm not sure it matters if every browser throws an exception.
      • joshuacc 11y ago
        User pfooti's comment referenced the specification[1]. You said that a browsers' implementation of the DOM API proves that it is illegal. I then linked to an issue with a detailed discussion of how the DOM API isn't consistent with itself, much less the HTML specification. [1]:http://www.w3.org/TR/html-markup/syntax.html#syntax-attributes http://www.w3.org/TR/html-markup/syntax.html#syntax-attribut...