3 ms·

I see several limitations in your analysis. The fundamental one is your insistence on "value." Where is that requirement? How do you define value? If I want 'd

by dalke 11y ago

I see several limitations in your analysis. The fundamental one is your insistence on "value." Where is that requirement? How do you define value? If I want 'dalke-email.com' as an email for me and my friends, without a web server or any attached business, then is that sufficient value? What about 'dalke-cat.com', a memorial site in memory of my cat - if a business wants the name, does it get priority over a site that no one else visits? Assume I have a new-born child named 'Kelly', and buy the domain name 'kellydalke.com', so that I can transfer it a a birthday present in 18 years. Is that value? To you, no, but to me, absolutely yes. How should the arbitration organization determine things? If your stealth-mode company takes too long to be public, can your domain name be taken away because it hasn't yet contributed value?

tallerholler 11y ago
You have valid points... I think it sucks that people can sit on domains without using them but you can always make the argument for why they should be allowed to. So now I have to decide between a .tv or .io domain (or hey I can use .rocks, .world, .xyz!!!) Do you think it is too risky to keep a name for a social startup (that has big potential) when the .com is taken? if it gets funded and gains traction, is there more of a chance of acquiring the domain down the line?
- detaro 11y ago
  Have you checked if you have legal means to get the domain? Here in Germany a trademark holder would have reasonable chances of getting control of a domain for the trademark if it isn't used.
  - tallerholler 11y ago
    I haven't checked but it's a valid point. I think we're going to register the trademark anyways just in case it helps the cause. One of my co-founders says he thinks that registering it after the fact won't have much affect but who knows. Also, the defunct public relations company that had the same name appears to not be in business and hasnt been for at least ~4-5 years...

by dalke 11y ago

tallerholler 11y ago

You have valid points... I think it sucks that people can sit on domains without using them but you can always make the argument for why they should be allowed to. So now I have to decide between a .tv or .io domain (or hey I can use .rocks, .world, .xyz!!!) Do you think it is too risky to keep a name for a social startup (that has big potential) when the .com is taken? if it gets funded and gains traction, is there more of a chance of acquiring the domain down the line?

detaro 11y ago
Have you checked if you have legal means to get the domain? Here in Germany a trademark holder would have reasonable chances of getting control of a domain for the trademark if it isn't used.
- tallerholler 11y ago
  I haven't checked but it's a valid point. I think we're going to register the trademark anyways just in case it helps the cause. One of my co-founders says he thinks that registering it after the fact won't have much affect but who knows. Also, the defunct public relations company that had the same name appears to not be in business and hasnt been for at least ~4-5 years...