4 ms·
Because of the amount of data. Being in public has never before meant that everything you did in public was stored in a format that will eventually be mined wh
by Lawtonfogle 11y ago
Because of the amount of data.
Being in public has never before meant that everything you did in public was stored in a format that will eventually be mined which private and public companies can get access to.
If you don't see the problem with this, wait til the mining software can detect homosexuals and is deployed in a country where you can be killed for being such.
"But I have nothing to hide." Maybe you do, maybe you don't. Even if you are good and the government is good right now, that still doesn't make you safe in the future. And it is quite clear there are already bad actors in the government. Perhaps you are the one about to expose another child abuse scandal... do you want the guy you are about to expose to have access to everything you've ever done in public, because I'm sure they can find a few minor crimes that they can then twist to silence you. Even if you are Jesus incarnate and have behaved perfectly while in public, they can still just edit it some misbehavior to silence you.
- golergka 11y ago> Because of the amount of data. I understand the rationale behind that. But as long as we can't put in an easy to check, precise limit to the "amount" of "data" that we allow collected, we'll never be able to effectively enforce that limit.
- repsilat 11y agoIf there is no sensible, enforceable limit between "none" and "as much as you want" (arguable), and if the latter is worse than the former (also arguable) then we'd naturally conclude that we should ban all of it. Perhaps there are "strange" compromises, though -- what if a business owner had to seek permission to view the footage of their permanent camera if it were in a public place?