4 ms·
Judges and juries don't understand logic, science, or technology and instead rely solely on show-and-tell presentations from paid 'experts'[1]. It scares the s
by aianus 11y ago
Judges and juries don't understand logic, science, or technology and instead rely solely on show-and-tell presentations from paid 'experts'[1].
It scares the shit out of me that my life would ever be in the hands of a bunch of glorified arts students in conjunction with random members of the population.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Clark https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Clark
- bitJericho 11y agoI guess I can't speak for the British system. And yeah im sure we can cite horrendous abuse and lapses of judgements all day. In general, I'm saying that judges write out their opinions and their reasoning in the open, very clearly, in the US.
- Retra 11y agoThere's a difference between writing down a justification for actions you've already taken and having your entire internal thought process open to public review.
- bitJericho 11y agoI don't know what you're talking about. When a judge writes his or her findings of fact, it details his justifications for his determinations. If you want his internal thought processes, I don't think a machine can help you there. A machine can't think. It can only decide a flowchart set of rules, something that won't work in a criminal court setting. You can't go lenient on someone who deserves it, or hard one someone who doesn't, which is the whole role of "justice". This is a justice system we have in the US, not a vengeance system.
- Retra 11y agoWell, I'm certainly not going to take you at your word for any of this.