2 ms·
I would hazard a guess that had that not been a mobile URL that the dupe-catcher would have worked as expected. So is this something that should be flagged, or
by mdaniel 11y ago
I would hazard a guess that had that not been a mobile URL that the dupe-catcher would have worked as expected.
So is this something that should be flagged, or we just wait for it to fall off the front page on its own?
- kazinator 11y agoWe need to Prune dupes away, by matching on key feature of their abstract syntax tree, rather than the naive URL text. That's The Dream anyway. Happy Pruning!
- __Joker 11y agoI had seen occasions where a trailing slash treats URL differently, who is very trivial to handle. While as mentioned in sister thread, mobile because of the dom might be little difficult to handle.