I think that, by claiming "it is mostly wrong to judge, except for this particular case, in which you can judge as much as you can", he's doing exactly that whi

I think that, by claiming "it is mostly wrong to judge, except for this particular case, in which you can judge as much as you can", he's doing exactly that which he criticizes. If he's going to out those that "hypocritically crusade for legally enforced morality", fair enough. But then I'm going to have a field day criticizing those that "hypocritically crusade against legally enforced morality" while actually expecting to live under the umbrella of such a system. He adds: "It’s worth remembering that the reality is often far more complex than the smug moralizers suggest", which is true. But I also find worth remembering that the reality is often far more complex than the smug anti-moralizers suggest too.