4 ms·
They're not a recruiter in the traditional sense, but I quite like hired.com - they're low-touch, and I much prefer to browse a list of candidates once a week t
by vosper 11y ago
They're not a recruiter in the traditional sense, but I quite like hired.com - they're low-touch, and I much prefer to browse a list of candidates once a week than field endless emails and calls and hard-selling from traditional recruiters.
We've hired from them, and although I think the signal-to-noise ratio has got worse in the past year, I usually still see one or two interesting people.