If they wanted to create a general "politician public statement archive" that included deleted tweets, I think that would be acceptable. Where they cross the l

If they wanted to create a general "politician public statement archive" that included deleted tweets, I think that would be acceptable. Where they cross the line is in only doing deleted tweets, and marketing themselves that way. The entire purpose of their product is to undo a feature of someone else's product. This story is being framed a certain way: "Twitter is a big corporation attacking the little guy in defense of evil politicians," and kids on Reddit are outraged. I don't think that's what's happening here at all. They're just defending the integrity of their product.