>But I also do not approve on taking action that would result in folks I do not know getting exposed. Folks have a right to their own lives. Do they? Say this

>But I also do not approve on taking action that would result in folks I do not know getting exposed. Folks have a right to their own lives. Do they? Say this was some tor service that was leaked with users engaging in what you would consider far more immoral activity. Would you feel the same way? Now, maybe you would. But for most I've spoken to about this hack, they would feel different. For them, they 'right to their own lives' only exists as long as they aren't doing something too immoral. The difference between them and I is not based on if we believe they have a right to privacy with their business... we both do believe there is a limited right. We merely disagree on where the limits are. For comparison, this isn't the difference between someone who believes in freedom of speech and someone who doesn't, but between two people who both believe in limited freedom of speech trying to decide if some individual case is bad enough to censor or not.