My anecdata is the exact opposite. I find the met office very accurate. One thing I have noticed is that the idiot glyphs they use don't tie into my expectatio

My anecdata is the exact opposite. I find the met office very accurate. One thing I have noticed is that the idiot glyphs they use don't tie into my expectations. I see a picture of the sun behind a cloud with a rain drop on it and I think "light showers". It actually means "40% chance of rain". A cloud with a rain drop and no sun still only means that there's a 50/50 chance of rain.