> ...oh, and Common Lisp is NOT an example of readable Lisp. It's probably the most unreadable and obsfucation-friendly of them all :) Actually typical Common

> ...oh, and Common Lisp is NOT an example of readable Lisp. It's probably the most unreadable and obsfucation-friendly of them all :) Actually typical Common Lisp is much more readable than Scheme or Clojure. 'obsfucation' is built-in in Clojure, where it has to be programmed in Common Lisp. Scheme has great potential for unreadable code, given it is a Lisp-1 and it makes heavy use of recursion and higher-order functions. Common Lisp OTOH favors: long descriptive names, descriptive keyword arguments, CLOS based data structures (instead of untyped lists and vectors), explicit loops, explicit calls to variable bound functions, ...