4 ms·
I'm always amused when I read comments like this, becuase they are so blatantly incorrect. I'm not sure where you got your MBA from, but I can tell you the foll
by Brushfire 17y ago
I'm always amused when I read comments like this, becuase they are so blatantly incorrect. I'm not sure where you got your MBA from, but I can tell you the following about my class:
- At least 1/3 already have an advanced degree in another subject. (Masters or PhD) Many of these are in engineering, sciences, psychology, medicine, etc.
- At least 95% have worked for at least 3 years, most of them have lead a team.
So these two items provide them with technical, domain-specific, and experiential knowledge upon which to use in bschool.
I dont think many MBA's would argue with you about the content of the degree; it is very different from a masters in computer science or physics. But it is also not intended to be the same.
One gets an MBA for 3 reasons: Networking, Skill Building, and Career Switching. Most degrees focus on just the skill-building aspect. Personally, for me, coming to a top ranked program and access to its huge alumni network was critical to my decision.
Please, before you knee jerk respond about how stupid all MBA's are, it might make sense to think about why so many smart, talented people continue to get them.
- loganfrederick 17y ago1. "Skill-building" is suspect in many MBA programs. The fact that one-third of your MBA class has advanced degrees doesn't say anything about the content of the MBA itself, just that you're at a top program attracting other smart people with skills. 2. If "most degrees" focus on skill-building, and those skills are suspect, it's then pretty fair to say that "most degrees" are of questionable value. 3. That leaves us with Networking and Career Switching. Career Switching is more a personal endeavor that an MBA can help with but doesn't necessarily guarantee a successful switch. 4. I would conclude then that the most important part of the MBA is the networking, and this value is proportional to the quality of the program's alumni.
- Brushfire 17y agoWhy is the skill-building suspect? What part of the content do you find so worthless? At least provide some examples or references to go along with your comment. B
- loganfrederick 17y ago*All my examples are from my own experiences. I currently attend the Ohio State University. While not bad, the most valuable of the MBA classes are those that are case study or project based. The pure textbook classes on accounting, finance, HR, etc. are valuable, but no more valuable than reading books on the subject without paying the tuition fee. While I believe in the case-study method, it's not significantly different than if an engineer-turned-MBA simply started his own firm. The difference between the MBA programs (generally, there are exceptions in areas like finance, logistics/operations, and MAcc for accounting) and Masters in other scientific fields is that in Masters of Science, you're further improving your skills in the field. Many of the MBAs I know are either non-business people taking the opportunity to learn important business skills that could be learned from experience or former business students learning an incremental amount of knowledge for massive tuition fees.
- Brushfire 17y agoThanks. Its interesting to hear other perspectives. I'm at University of Chicago. There are pretty much 3 types of classes here, Case-based, Tool-Based, or Labs. Very few of the professors use textbooks at all, if they do they are purely for reference, not for primary use. Having owned 2 businesses before school, I think you are right that some lessons can be learned through experience. However, this is an asset during discussion because we have a variety of people with a variety of backgrounds adding their experiential knowledge into the discussions - so the value derived is higher than just experiencing it yourself. For example, I have no experience with retail operations or with industrial manufacturing, but some of the lessons they learned the hard way might be useful to me later on as a software startup guy, and some of the lessons I learned during my companies might be useful to them down the road. The other benefit of University of Chicago is that the MBA program does not have a fixed curriculum, so students craft their own program of study (there are some guidelines), and they can choose to study deep in one area (for example, Econometrics or Analytical Finance) or for those with less business experience to go more broad.
- mschy 17y agoAn MBA is a basic business toolkit. It's an opportunity to understand the basics of accounting, finance, management, business law, statistics, communication and marketing, as well as to take a few advanced classes in fields that interest you. It's also an opportunity to meet people who are sufficiently interested in business, and their careers, to expose themselves to these fundamentals. As happens with all degrees, some people really seize the opportunity to sharpen their skills for the future, and others simply try to pass the classes. Further, some people are incredibly bright and able to apply the knowledge usefully, whereas others do so clumsily or not at all. I wouldn't kick somebody out of my office for not having an MBA, nor would I hire them simply because they had one. But that said, I think those disparaging it do so to the detriment of those who listen to them. It's a useful toolkit. I used to be one of those who disparaged MBAs. Now I have one, and have often been thankful for the breadth of knowledge I was forced to acquire, as well as for the innumerable case studies I read, that really changed the way I consume business news, and the way I think about business strategy.