3 ms·
Thanks for taking the time. I've read the wikipedia article and think i got the argument better : from what i got, you can't have a "classical" effect underlyi
by bsaul 11y ago
Thanks for taking the time.
I've read the wikipedia article and think i got the argument better : from what i got, you can't have a "classical" effect underlying QM, because it would mean faster than light transmission of information. And yet, experimentally, Bell's experiment has been done, and it is working the way it is predicted by QM (the famous "spooky action at a distance").
Would that be correct ?
- mirimir 11y agoYes, comprehension = getting the math. Comprehension <> classical visualization. That's what I eventually accepted, anyway.