2 ms·
Well, maybe implementation detail is not a good way to put it. But as my other comment shows, I think he's even more worried about the semantics of the construc
by hyperpape 11y ago
Well, maybe implementation detail is not a good way to put it. But as my other comment shows, I think he's even more worried about the semantics of the construct than how the machine executes it.
- Veedrac 11y agoSure; but he blames the type for its semantics. New languages have shown that * even with the downsides, pointers are absolutely worth it, and * the type's semantics can be improved, removing many of the types's problems.