3 ms·
I very much doubt that Smalltalk-80 was fun to use on a lowly PC-AT ;-) This was -- USD 199.95 Smalltalk/V286 March 7, 1988. https://books.google.com/books?id
by igouy 11y ago
I very much doubt that Smalltalk-80 was fun to use on a lowly PC-AT ;-)
This was -- USD 199.95 Smalltalk/V286 March 7, 1988.
https://books.google.com/books?id=CD8EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA25&lpg=PA25&dq=digitalk+smalltalk+v/286&source=bl&ots=jg-JNM2df5&sig=zCZ6zSeRV1zcLMT_VhaK49_YWkQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CFIQ6AEwB2oVChMIh-Xi5qS9xwIVkCWICh1taQpK#v=onepage&q=digitalk%20smalltalk%20v%2F286&f=false https://books.google.com/books?id=CD8EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA25&lpg=P...
- rjsw 11y agoSmalltalk/V (not 286) was perfectly usable on a PC of the day, I ran it on an Olivetti M24 with a paper white display. The Smalltalk-80 flyer states that an 8MHz 286 was faster than a Xerox Dolphin and 20% of the speed of a Xerox Dorado. The painful part would have been the display, they were just using EGA (640x350) so you couldn't see much at one time. I saw a demo of this and don't remember thinking that it was too slow.
- igouy 11y agoBack-in-the-day I did not consider Smalltalk/V usable, that changed with V286 :-)