Would you be okay with spending cash on a project with 75% waste? I mean, I get that debt exacerbates the cost, but I think waste/fraud is a just a different t

Would you be okay with spending cash on a project with 75% waste? I mean, I get that debt exacerbates the cost, but I think waste/fraud is a just a different topic than optimal debt levels. I've done construction work for large private contractors in the nuclear energy field and the level of waste there was off the charts as well. I didn't work in management or accounting or anything, but I get the impression that certain types of large, complex, organizations are intrinsically inefficient. I don't know why, but maybe it's more costly and time consuming to try and root out the waste? We should definitely try to improve this! But it's a really difficult management/planning problem without a clear solution and in the mean time, we still need to make choices about spending and that might mean taking on debt. I don't really understand economics well enough to have a strong opinion on the article, but I believe the point was that higher debt levels might be better, regardless of how the money is spent.