3 ms·
> If you're against this law in some cases, you have to be against it in all cases. I don't know what this is supposed to mean. Of course, if I am against a la
by hyperpape 11y ago
> If you're against this law in some cases, you have to be against it in all cases.
I don't know what this is supposed to mean. Of course, if I am against a law, I think it should not exist. And that covers all cases.
But equally obviously, I can say that there are cases where applying the law has better or worse consequences.
- smt88 11y ago> I have to admit there are cases that I find innocuous when considered by themselves I was referring to that statement. It's never "innocuous" because there's no universal, objective guideline for what is innocuous and what isn't. Something that seems innocuous to you as a spectator may not be for people involved.
- hyperpape 11y ago"It's never harmful because there's no universal, objective guideline for what is harmful and what isn't".