4 ms·
...is this the string library you are referring to? http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/strings.html http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/strings.html ...o
by xrange 11y ago
...is this the string library you are referring to?
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/strings.html http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/strings.html
...or something more extensive?
- sigzero 11y agoI am not sure what you are getting at? More extensive? Those are basic string functions.
- xrange 11y agoOne man's paltry can be another man's extravagant. If you are coming from R5RS, then that Racket library would be a breath of fresh air. If you are coming from Perl, then maybe not so much.
- elibarzilay 11y agoThat's the first time I hear of Racket being accused of being too small... Looking at http://perldoc.perl.org/index-functions-by-cat.html#Functions-for-SCALARs-or-strings http://perldoc.perl.org/index-functions-by-cat.html#Function... I count about 30 functions (including regexp ones); looking at the racket page I count over 50. Also, I once got the snow yellow at over 3 meters.