5 ms·

I also used to rely pretty heavily on Tree Style Tabs. With the release of 42 I've been using tab groups (cmd+shift+e) with pretty satisfactory results. e: cmd

by mft 11y ago

I also used to rely pretty heavily on Tree Style Tabs. With the release of 42 I've been using tab groups (cmd+shift+e) with pretty satisfactory results. e: cmd+shift+e assumes a Mac. Not sure what other systems use.

mitchty 11y ago
Hmm, i'll have to try that thanks for the heads up. Losing tree style tabs in 42 has made me nervous, it was the primary reason I love firefox. Without that most of the why in using firefox goes away for me.
- reitanqild 11y ago
  Tried Pale Moon?[0] And no, I am not affiliated in any way just a happy user that assumes more users are better then fewer users. [0]:https://www.palemoon.org https://www.palemoon.org
  - mitchty 11y ago
    Never heard of it, quick scan of the page seems to indicate that it is windows/linux only though? I did a quick look at the download page and didn't see an osx build. That is overall fine but I like to keep my browsers portable across all of my primary operating systems.
    - reitanqild 11y ago
      Yeah, that's kind of my only advantage for not liking Mac (wish I did:). Still, it is just a forked Firefox so it uses the same extensions etc for now, maybe using FF on Mac and PM on the other platforms would be possible?
    - richardboegli 11y ago
      Pale Moon for Mac OSX 24.7.1 https://forum.palemoon.org/viewforum.php?f=41 https://forum.palemoon.org/viewforum.php?f=41
  - CyberShadow 11y ago
    Pale Moon's stance on pdf.js makes me very nervous: https://www.palemoon.org/technical.shtml#features https://www.palemoon.org/technical.shtml#features As I understand, the author's opinion is that Adobe Reader is more secure than pdf.js. I'm not sure I would trust them with maintaining a secure browser in light of that. Their monetization model is also questionable (I understand it injects ads / referral links).
    - Springtime 11y ago
      > Their monetization model is also questionable (I understand it injects ads / referral links). Any source for that? A quick search didn't turn up anything and seeing as Pale Moon is now on my shortlist of Firefox alternatives I'd be interested.
      - CyberShadow 11y ago
        Sorry, I might have been confused there, looking at where I thought I read that I see it's just the default search engine: http://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=7818 http://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=7818
    - CyberShadow 11y ago
      For my own reference: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10100294 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10100294
- deleted 11y ago
  [deleted]

by mft 11y ago

mitchty 11y ago

Hmm, i'll have to try that thanks for the heads up. Losing tree style tabs in 42 has made me nervous, it was the primary reason I love firefox. Without that most of the why in using firefox goes away for me.

reitanqild 11y ago
Tried Pale Moon?[0] And no, I am not affiliated in any way just a happy user that assumes more users are better then fewer users. [0]:https://www.palemoon.org https://www.palemoon.org
- mitchty 11y ago
  Never heard of it, quick scan of the page seems to indicate that it is windows/linux only though? I did a quick look at the download page and didn't see an osx build. That is overall fine but I like to keep my browsers portable across all of my primary operating systems.
  - reitanqild 11y ago
    Yeah, that's kind of my only advantage for not liking Mac (wish I did:). Still, it is just a forked Firefox so it uses the same extensions etc for now, maybe using FF on Mac and PM on the other platforms would be possible?
  - richardboegli 11y ago
    Pale Moon for Mac OSX 24.7.1 https://forum.palemoon.org/viewforum.php?f=41 https://forum.palemoon.org/viewforum.php?f=41
- CyberShadow 11y ago
  Pale Moon's stance on pdf.js makes me very nervous: https://www.palemoon.org/technical.shtml#features https://www.palemoon.org/technical.shtml#features As I understand, the author's opinion is that Adobe Reader is more secure than pdf.js. I'm not sure I would trust them with maintaining a secure browser in light of that. Their monetization model is also questionable (I understand it injects ads / referral links).
  - Springtime 11y ago
    > Their monetization model is also questionable (I understand it injects ads / referral links). Any source for that? A quick search didn't turn up anything and seeing as Pale Moon is now on my shortlist of Firefox alternatives I'd be interested.
    - CyberShadow 11y ago
      Sorry, I might have been confused there, looking at where I thought I read that I see it's just the default search engine: http://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=7818 http://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=7818
  - CyberShadow 11y ago
    For my own reference: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10100294 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10100294
deleted 11y ago
[deleted]