[Replying to myself r/than frozbozz as I seem to have hit some kind of nesting limit.] > just that you seemed to be rebutting the wrong point It's more that I

[Replying to myself r/than frozbozz as I seem to have hit some kind of nesting limit.] > just that you seemed to be rebutting the wrong point It's more that I'm questioning the interpretation you've put on angdis' initial comment. Your logic is impeccable, but it leads to conclusions that are so at odds with the tone of his/her post that I feel you are crediting him/her with too much coherence and consistency.