3 ms·
Yup, this seems to be more of the same. And, yes, HTTPS prevents them from filtering out anything below the entire domain. I hadn't actually realised wikipedia
by oneeyedpigeon 11y ago
Yup, this seems to be more of the same. And, yes, HTTPS prevents them from filtering out anything below the entire domain. I hadn't actually realised wikipedia was HTTPS-only until now; I'm unsure why we can't have the option of either protocol.
- Houshalter 11y agoBecause they want to prevent this situation exactly. You either have to ban Wikipedia in its entirety or let everything be uncensored and anonymous. In theory there is nothing stopping them from making their own version of Wikipedia. By scraping all the content from the original. But that's a lot of work compared to adding a web page to a block list.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]