> And while it may have been more egalitarian to treat everyone the same, the kids on the bottom didn't really go anywhere. Top-down controlling bureaucrats mi

> And while it may have been more egalitarian to treat everyone the same, the kids on the bottom didn't really go anywhere. Top-down controlling bureaucrats might think it more egalitarian, but treating everyone indifferently to their particular needs is not egalitarian. The world is rich enough to provide ample resources for all children to meet all their needs. If children and educators could organize education to meet their needs instead of being forced to obey governments or markets, that would be egalitarian.