4 ms·
I agree with you that editing the human genome is not generally ethically objectionable and should be allowed, but I also think that tinkering with our genome w
by Chickenosaurus 11y ago
I agree with you that editing the human genome is not generally ethically objectionable and should be allowed, but I also think that tinkering with our genome will create a whole new set of societal issues that will reinforce the current ones, which humanity has been historically bad at solving.
Imagine a world where genetical engineering is very effective, but not cheap. The already advantaged can create designer babies and therefore have the ability to give their offspring an additional edge. Social mobility could be seriously limited if unmodified humans have a worse chance to get good work or work at all. Even today, many people see the poor as inferior because they often have a bad education. In the future, they could be legitimately genetically inferior.
Gattaca (1997) is an excellent movie with a similar theme: “A genetically inferior man assumes the identity of a superior one in order to pursue his lifelong dream of space travel“.
- vectorjohn 11y agoI'm always pretty skeptical of the worry that this will be restricted to wealthy. For one, I don't think it would (or at least not for long), but additionally, won't that just mean that the people with these benefits will just out compete the rest? So over time everyone alive will have whatever the benefits are even if slowly. This is just a much faster version of natural selection. In other words, in the long run it won't matter is all I'm saying.
- redthrowaway 11y agoVaccines and clean drinking water used to be restricted to the wealthy, too.