Quoting the data lost as a percentage of disk space is both accurate and misleading. It makes the impact sound tiny because only recent writes were affected. Ob

Quoting the data lost as a percentage of disk space is both accurate and misleading. It makes the impact sound tiny because only recent writes were affected. Obviously writes that were in flight at the time of the incident are going to be a tiny percentage of overall storage. What they don't tell us is what percentage of persistent disks which were in use at the time were affected. That percentage is likely far higher. If only 0.000001% of volumes in use were affected it would never have made the news.